Pretty much everyone agrees scaffolding students’ work is a ‘good thing’. Whenever they get stuck we leap in with our trusty writing frames and help them get going. A good writing frame can teach an understanding of text coherence and structure, prompt metacognition and serve as jolly useful checklist.
But I think we get a few things wrong.
Thinking about where the scaffolding metaphor comes from is instructive. Builders use scaffolding to enable them to attempt projects which would be otherwise impossible – or at least very unsafe. They do not use scaffolding to help them knock together a dwarf wall in your back garden. And then, when they’ve erected their shining skyscrapers, they take the scaffolding away. Unless scaffolding is removed we are unable to fully appreciate an architect’s vision.
In teaching, we tend to use scaffolding to make work easier. In order to prevent students feeling stuck, or overcoming difficulty, we give them a writing frame. Then, when they’ve finished, we leave it there.
I want to suggest two principles for the effective use of scaffolding.
First, we should never use scaffolding to make easy work easier. We should only ever use it to make the impossible possible. We need to simplify the task sufficiently to allow pupils to attempt it, but make it hard enough so that everyone has to do something challenging. Everyone should struggle, no matter their ability.
Second, never put up scaffolding unless you have a plan for taking it down. If we leave it there, students will become dependent on it. They’ll never be able to perform without support, and this often ends up stifling their ideas and expression. Clunky straightjackets like PEE (Point Evidence Explain) and its many variants can be useful as a starting point, but as soon as students have mastered using them they need to be taken away. Taking away the scaffold forces students to struggle. The act of dredging memory for ideas helps the process to become internalised. If students are struggling too much, put the scaffold (or at least some of it) back. And then take it away again. As soon as possible.
If you’re interested, here’s a method for removing scaffolding from writing.
Given how redundant the Piagetian stage model now seems to be in terms of practical application, it’s great if we could make sure that we truly keep to the heart of the Vygotskian model. It is simply one of the most fundamental universal truths in education (to my mind).
Sometimes the simplest points are the ones most worth making – thanks.
I would suggest to add a third point: Ask yourself how exactly the scaffolding should be done. Is it “modelling”, as Bruner suggests, or can you imagine other ways to introduce new “mediating tools”, as Vygotsky describes it?
Reminds me of Bandura talking about self-efficviacy in the 70’s. Challenge your students meaningfully, Adjust the challenge level to match the moving target that is their evolving ability.
Challenges should be attainable, but make demands.
Support your novices to ensure they stay focused, motivated and that they achieve.
Remove supports/constraints from your experts to ensure they stay focused, motivated, and that they continue to achieve, and retain what they’ve learned.
I do sometimes wonder what people mean when they say scaffolding though. The devil is in the detail.
[…] Scaffolding: what we can learn from the metaphor – David Didau: The Learning Spy. […]
[…] scaffolding in order to give students a taste of success is certainly a good idea, but ideally, scaffolding should be used to make inaccessible tasks possible rather than moderately easy tasks easier. We over praise in order to protect students’ […]
[…] capable others and with more advanced materials. This is the good old zone of proximal development. Scaffolding to you and me. Mixed in with all this is the notion that cognition is situated, that it is to say, […]
[…] Scaffolding: what we can learn from the metaphor […]
[…] be sufficiently challenging that every student will struggle. Those who struggle more will require more scaffolding for longer. If students finish early, then maybe the task wasn’t open-ended enough? Maybe it needs to be […]
[…] for differences becomes much more focused and interesting. With a modest amount of modelling* and scaffolding, students are well on the way to writing a comparative essay. It certainly pays to explicitly teach […]
[…] students see expertise in action they can mimic. With scaffolding and plenty of practice they become increasingly […]
[…] sometimes at length and it’s worth knowing that this depends on effective modelling and scaffolding. Maybe the most advantaged students will have read enough to be able to intuit how to write well […]
[…] A few years ago, I suggested two rules for effective scaffolding: […]
[…] the spelling voice is a scaffold. I’ve always liked David Didau’s principles for scaffolding. And his two principles apply to […]
[…] the spelling voice is a scaffold. I’ve always liked David Didau’s principles for scaffolding. And his two principles apply to […]