There is however one consistently ugly blot on this bright landscape. It’s not the workload – they’re up for that. They’re still young and supple enough to cope with the absurd demands placed on a teacher’s time. It’s not even pupils’ sometimes stunningly insolent, casually vindictive and plain bone idle behaviour – they went into teaching with their eyes open; they’d watched Educating Essex and Tough Young Teachers.
No, what most blights the careers of all these able young torch bearers is the blithe manner in which experienced teachers systematically undermine their efforts to instil discipline and maintain order. It’s bad enough that young teachers are still being sold the destructive lie that students will behave if lessons are planned appropriately; that if students do misbehave (and they most certainly do) it’s the teacher’s fault for not being fun enough.
But worse, schools’ behaviour systems seem designed to crush all prospect of teachers getting a chance to learn their craft. Consider this example of the lunatic way one school allows pupils to do exactly as they please:
- 1st instance of disruptive behaviour: verbal warning (C1)
- 2nd instance: name is written on board (C2)
- 3rd instance: After school detention is issued (C3)
- 4th instance: warning that further disruption will result in external isolation
- 5th instance: student is removed form the lesson and spends the following day in chokey (C4).
Students are allowed commit the same atrocity FOUR TIMES before the teacher is allowed to remove them from lessons! But there’s more. If student gets a ‘C3’ their parents have to be contacted to allow them to be detained after school. If students get a ‘C4’ their parents do not have to be informed and often aren’t. Most students don’t like their parents knowing they’ve been badduns and so they actively seek out a C4 in preference to a C3!
If we accept pupils flicking each other in the ear four times before they’re removed, we’re telling them four flicks are acceptable. It’s only the fifth flick that merits serious sanction. What kind of message does that send?
Possibly this kind of system could be excused for being the product of unthinking blindness. Maybe leaders don’t realise the trouble this kind of system causes for teachers at the start of their careers. Maybe they’ve forgotten how hard it is to start out. Maybe. Except that many of the teachers I’ve spoken to have said they are presented with further obstacles.
One teacher told me a story about two boys engaging in a foul-mouthed, high volume exchange before pulling down their trousers and leaving the room. When she recorded this on the system the boys were duly collected by SLT and asked to account for their behaviour. “We weren’t swearing at her. We were just, like, swearing.” The school leader decided this was reasonable and told the teacher that he was reversing her decision and that the boys would be returning to her lesson! Can you imagine?
Other teachers have told me stories about there being too many students in isolation on a given day so some children’s demerits mysteriously disappear from the school system. Other ways in which teachers are undermined is by asking them not to record incidences of poor behaviour as it “creates too much paperwork” and “looks bad on the figures”. And of course there’s the classic undermining tactic of telling teachers they’ve issued too many consequences and will clearly need to be ‘supported’ until they fall into line. Perhaps the story I’ve been most shocked by is a teacher saying that because he appears to be the only member of staff to issue negative behaviour points to one particular class that the problem must be his not theirs. He has had the class removed and been given a new class who have been given carte blanche to do whatever the hell they like. I find this outrageous. That two experienced members of staff – a deputy head and a head of department – could collude to smash a young teacher’s reputation so publicly is morally reprehensible.
In every school I visit I have trailed this message along behind me: The primary responsibility for behaviour rests with the school, not the teacher. Of course teachers must bear some of the responsibility for the behaviour of pupils in their lessons. And of course having a well-planned lesson helps. But without watertight systems, classroom teachers are put in an untenable position.
In an effort to consider whether new (or indeed any) teachers are being systematically undermined, consider whether any of these apply to your school:
- Pupils swear at teachers without being excluded
- Supply teachers and NQTs (and lunch staff) are hazed and hounded by baying packs of feral children
- Teachers send pupils out of classrooms for poor behaviour only to have a member of SLT bring them back in and undermine their authority in front of the class
- Teachers are expected to set and administer all their own detentions and follow up every misdemeanour witnessed in the name of ‘improving relationships’ or to turn a blind eye and pretend it’s not happening.
If so, you work in a bad school. And if you lead in a school where these oh-so-ordinary atrocities routinely occur, shame on you.
[…] Read more on The Learning Spy… […]
Fortunately I do not work in such a school. Teachers here complain occasionally, but how little they know what it can be like on the ‘outside’!
Another diatribe against senior leaders.
I don’t work in this type of school either, but I do know that many leaders have to work under immense pressure and scrutiny.
Your words would carry greater authority if you walked the walk yourself.
For how long were you a senior leader?
Ah – an ad hominem – only serving teachers are allowed to criticise schools?
Of course SLT are under huge pressure and unreasonable scrutiny. I’ve said as much on numerous occasions. But that can never be an excuse for undermining new teachers. SLT are more experienced, have much more authority and are paid specifically to lead their schools. Anyone who seeks to make this kind of excuse is very much contributing to the problem.
You’re fortunate to work in a supportive school. If you’ve not worked in a poorly led school maybe you have no idea how the behaviour I describe ruins careers.
Not fortunate, because I help lead the school. I do recognise the behaviour you describe. As you point out “ad hominem” I actually agree with what you are saying, but I think your opinions would carry more weight if you were still a school leader putting them into practice. Because it’s bloody hard to keep going and too many good people choose to leave. I’m paying you a complement in a roundabout sort of way. I noted your stated desire to keep your hand in a few days a week on our bio page. No takers?
I don’t at all underestimate how hard it is to lead a school, but if that’s the job you’ve chosen to do then it seems reasonable that you do it well. I’ve chosen, for various reasons, not to do that job. I agree that my opinion might well be more respected if was grafting at the chalkface but on the other hand, I get to visit many more schools than I would otherwise be able to and my opinion carries the weight of having seen first hand what it’s like for teachers across the system.
Maybe both roles are needed?
I’ve had offers but none of them are workable. Where are you?
[…] What’s it like being a new teacher? | David Didau: The Learning Spy […]
Hi David,
This school sounds like a difficult one and probably has had difficulties in the past to have such a system in place do you think? I personally am fortunate enough not to work in such a school. I find that new teachers are very enthusiastic and want their lesson to be productive.
What would you suggest a school could do to support new teachers who have a system in place like the one you have described?
You will find many people too SCARED to comment on this for FEAR of their jobs but they wholeheartedly agree and have experienced what you’re saying from WHERE you write about – and yes, I am talking from experience of THIS SCHOOL
Yes this school has had difficulties but as a member of staff you’ve got two choices- play along and do as you’re told or leave/be pushed out. A school like his should SUPPORT their staff and address the issues, not BLAME the staff and pretend all is wonderful.
It is such a relief to see this. I was blamed for poor behaviour, but when I left it happened I took my partner in to collect things. My partner was appalled by the place, asked why there was egg up a wall, and why the corridors were full of rubbish. My partner (who had been a Youth Worker) told me this was no school to work in and that I was lucky to get out.
Hi Jane
I’m writing a bout a composite of different schools but I’m very sorry to hear about your experiences. If you want to email me I will happily post anonymously.
Hm bad luck, may be.
Hi
I,m from Spain, and i lived in UK for a few years. I would like to say that student´s behavior in UK is much better than in my country, although there are always room for improvement everywhere. I believe that respect for teachers should be taught at an early age.
Regards.
[…] If you believe good behaviour is a product of good teaching then you’re likely also to believe that poor behaviour is a result of poor teaching. From this, it logically follows that students only misbehave for bad teachers. If kids muck about it’s because you’re not going your job. I wrote about where that leads here. […]
Ah, yes … The lack of support from school leadership and the complaint about recording misdemeanours rings many bells. When I left my last school in the UK, the headteacher mentioned things that would be missed with my exit. Oddly enough, he mentioned the often thrice daily emails I sent to SLT about truancy and destructive behaviour happening outside my classroom whilst I was teaching. This had been going on for a while as the school also had an exclusion room, run by a TA, which students regularly walked out of simply because they could. Instead of leaving the premises, they ran riot, quite literally on some days.
I now teach abroad, and such problems rarely happen.
[…] What’s it like being a new teacher? A teacher who is not dogmatic is simply a teacher who is not teaching. […]
[…] If you believe good behaviour is a product of good teaching then you’re likely also to believe that poor behaviour is a result of poor teaching. From this, it logically follows that students only misbehave for bad teachers. If kids muck about it’s because you’re not going your job. I wrote about where that leads here. […]
This is my school exactly. I used to love my job and don’t want to leave. What can we do about it?
I’ve just left a school like this. Repeatedly suggested school wide detentions and an automated parental contact system to take workload off but was told teachers need to take responsibility for behaviour in their lessons! Implications: if you address poor behaviour you need to be punished.
Diligent staff would be on the phone to numerous parents every night but most would just ignore all but the worst incidents to save themselves the hassle.
“You’re the only teacher who has a problem with this class” is wielded as a constant threat of “competency procedures”.
I was a confident, experienced teacher when I arrived and the constant undermining (sending back students I had sent out/ HoD telling students I had kept for detention that they didn’t have to try the work I was asking them to complete; it’s enough that they turned up!/ Swearing, aggression and lewd comments not taken further because I should be able to deal with it) nearly broke me!
An excellent blog, saying exactly what I’ve been saying for years. It was particularly rife in my last school. I left because SLT clearly incompetent. Now v at brilliant supportive school.
I disagree this is always the case. We have the C system. But all of the short comings you highlight do not exist. It is about how you implement policies and the level of support. We have relentless high standards and expectations, are out and about frequently to support teachers and never undermine the staff members.
Can I ask what role you have in your school? I’m assuming you’re a senior leader (correct me if I’m wrong). I’m glad to hear you never undermine teachers but then I’ve never met a senior leader who thinks they do. It might be worth you giving your staff an anonymised survey on how effective they think your system is and how supported they feel.