We hope we are transparent and honest. I am very keen that the people we inspect have confidence in the quality of our inspections and the quality of our inspectors. I believe the quality of inspection and the quality of our inspectors has gone up over the last few years.
Sir Michael Wilshaw
I’m genuinely of the belief that Ofsted as an organisation is trying hard to put right some of the worst excesses it has been responsible for in its 21 year history. But certain attitudes make the task so much harder.
Consider this from the boss:
We have done more to raise standards in 21 years of existence than any other organisation.
Really? Really!?
If you want to examine this ‘extraordinary claim’ in detail, click here.
In my conversations with Mike Cladingbowl and new National Director for Schools, Sean Harford, I’ve found a real willingness to acknowledge the mistakes of the past and provide clarity and guidance to minimise the likelihood of school leaders frantically trying to deliver ‘what Ofsted want’ in the future. Ofsted really is trying to reinvent itself, but it’s an uphill struggle.
Yesterday I reblogged a post from @cazzbooth where she detailed the fall from grace of ‘Mr Howarth’. The post isn’t about Ofsted but very few teachers can have failed to encounter the warping effects of the ‘child-centred inquisition’ since the Christine Gilbert years. We know, whatever our ideological stripe or teaching preference that inspectors explicitly rooted out and condemned teacher talk, ‘passivity’ and teacher-led lessons. We have suffered at the hands of wave upon wave of consultants who have sought to inculcate us in the ‘preferred Ofsted style’ of group work, independent learning and ‘progress in 20 minutes’. This much is not in doubt. The inspectorate has the power to make or break careers and those who’ve ignored its prescriptions have either been astoundingly brave or uncommonly foolish.
Neither is it in doubt that those teachers who have been unable or unwilling to perform the Monkey dance have suffered for it. Fearful school leaders have whole-heartedly embraced the dogma that a 20 minute performance trumps results. In the past I once witnessed a head og geography explaining their poor results by claiming it was because their lessons were so outstanding! Well, quite.
But the tide has turned. Mike Cladingbowl’s subsidiary guidance and the new Inspection Handbook to be published for September have made it clear that this must all change.
So why on earth do we have HMI like David Brown and Additional Inspectors (and consultants) like Paul Garvey making unhelpful claims like these:
Now, it’s reasonable to point out that Ofsted are not directly accountable for the decisions of school leaders and David Brown is right to point out that Ofsted are used an excuse when Headteachers need to bulldoze through some cockamamie ‘improvement’. And yes, of course inspectors would never suggest a member of staff be sacked. But fear of running afoul of inspectors’ preferences for child-centred learning is surely behind a great many school policies. I’m not for a moment suggesting this is deliberate, but a sure as night follows day it what happens when an organisation responsible for exposing failure is also given the power to dictate ‘best practice’.
Here’s what I think it would be helpful for any inspector who was employed before Wilshaw’s tenure to say:
1. I’m sorry – I was following what I believed to be best practice and I was wrong.
2. Here is what I am doing to try to improve matters…
Any attempt to defend, excuse or explain away the excess of the past merely serve to tarnish and diminish attempts to improve the system for the future. If you’re not actively part of the solution I’m afraid you’re very much part of the problem.
Oh, and arguments to authority and invoking confirmation bias don’t really help matters either:
Related posts
This post by Old Andrew covers similar ground: An Example of OFSTED’s Inconsistency
Teacher Talk: the missing link
The shocking mediation of Ofsted criteria by ‘rogue’ inspectors
Still grading lessons? The triumph of experience over hope
I very much doubt if any inspector will apologise for their malign influence on teaching practise over the years. However, David Brown does have a point when he says Headteachers are using Ofsted as an excuse to do what they want. Across the country headteachers are using observations to root out teachers who don’t fit in with their prejudices. A huge part of the problem is arrogant and bullying Headteachers who have risen to the top because of their adherence to the teaching orthodoxies you rightly deride.
Hi Mark – yes – this is a fair point. But…
Ofsted is the prime mover here.
1) Ofsted mandate a ‘preferred style’
2) Some Heads follow this preference and are graded ‘outstanding’ as their reward
3) These heads then use Ofsted as an excuse for enforcing their preferences.
My problem with David Brown’s position is that he claims that in 30 years experience of teaching he has found Ofsted never to be the problem. How can we take seriously a man who makes such a preposterous claim?
David, you are beginning to sound a little obsessed here with Ofsted as the root of all evil. The best educators I’ve seen know that learning can happen in many ways. They also know that a solid evidence base should be able to support this, not just a set of opinions or anecdotes. A solid evidence base takes time to create and is hard to refute, whichever organisation you work for.
I refute your statements above. Ofsted do not advocate a preferred style, nor do they judge lessons on 20 minute snapshots. If people have wrongly understood this, and that can go for consultants, head teachers as well as some inspectors, it is often their own lack of real experience that is to blame. Having worked with over 200 schools, both here and abroad, I prefer to leave my hobby horses at home and apply an open minded, common sense but evidence based approach when discussing learning with my peers.
You might have misunderstood the points I’ve been trying to make, but happily my ‘hobby horse’ has led to being invited to help write the new Inspection Handbook due for publication next month. I hope you’ll be able to see some positive benefit from my obsession 🙂
Well congratulations on that. I hope so too.
I’m a little shocked to discover that Paul Garvey is an additional inspector. Is that really true? I had to block him on Twitter due to rudeness.
Yes, I’ve found him ‘difficult’ too.
[…] My impatience with some Ofsted inspectors […]
[…] My impatience with some Ofsted inspectors 24th July 2014 Ofsted: The end of the (lesson grading) affair 4th June 2014 Should Ofsted judge ‘quality of teaching’? 26th May 2014 A horror story: Does Ofsted get it wrong again? 23rd May 2014 Ofsted inspectors continue to do whatever they like 21st May 2014 Watching the watchmen: Is Ofsted fit for purpose? 16th March 2014 The mystery of Oldfield School’s missing Ofsted report 17th March 2014 What inspirational teaching looks like according to Ofsted 18th February 2014 What I learned from my visit to Ofsted 19th February 2014 Are we any clearer? Ofsted explain what they do and don’t do 21st February 2014 Ofsted’s Evaluation Form: the next skirmish! 22nd February 2014 The shocking mediation of Ofsted criteria by ‘rogue’ inspectors 10th November 2013 Who inspects Ofsted? 5th February 2012 – who indeed? Myths: what Ofsted want 17th March 2012 – do they even know? […]